Showing posts with label Firefly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Firefly. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2015

SERENITY: Scary Girl and Hollow Man

Note: There’s still time to enter my blogversary giveaway, so hop on over there for a chance to win a copy of Ray Bradbury’s FAHRENHEIT 451 (you know, if you want).

Warning: As always, I try to stay relatively spoiler free. But it doesn’t hurt to proceed with caution.


Can I just say? SERENITY. IS. INTENSE. I’m pretty sure Joss Whedon missed his calling—obviously he was meant to be Master Torturer or Head Executioner or something like that, because he is just a tiny bit brutal. I’m torn between sending him fan mail and sending him hate mail—it’s really a toss-up.

So let’s talk about this.

In my FIREFLY discussion, I introduced some of the characters, and with them, a bit of the moral ambiguity which forms the backbone of the show and its companion movie. But I’m not sure I delved into the many aspects of the story as well as I could have, so let’s go a bit further, beginning with the two characters who take center stage in SERENITY.

River. You thought you knew River before? Seriously, no—if you haven’t seen SERENITY, you haven’t met her yet. Just trust me. The most important thing you need to realize about River is that she is both extremely old—in that she has suffered extensive trauma, not to mention the fact that she makes geniuses look like idiots—and incredibly young—for example, her heavy dependence on Simon. In FIREFLY, we get a quick glimpse at the dangerous side of River, when she guns down three men and treats it like a game. Clearly this isn’t an easy case of cold-blooded killer vs. scared girl acting out of self-defense. What makes this even less simple is that she exhibits many symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. And given her unstable nature and her occasional run-ins with the crew, it’s difficult even to determine whether she’s friend or foe. While she generally feels bad when she hurts others, it remains uncertain whether she’s able to process this guilt fully.

Let’s give her a break, though, since she’s had the government poking and prodding around in her brain, turning her into a tool for its own use. Yet, after all that, she never intentionally plays the victim card, which might be why I’m especially fond of her. Considering her condition, she would be well within her rights to lie down and play dead, so to speak, to let the others do for her and pick up the slack. Instead, on several occasions, she risks her life for the lives of her friends and proves how truly strong she is, despite her brokenness.

Captain Malcom Reynolds. Mal is a hard nut to crack, in more ways than one. At first glance, he comes across as cocky and capable, almost light-hearted, a man who views life as a giant game. But he might possibly be one of the most broken characters you could ever come across, and he wears his over-confident exterior as a mask to disguise the part of him that can’t leave the battle of Serenity Valley behind, no matter how long it’s been since the end of the war.

In SERENITY, now that Inara is no longer living aboard the ship, we see a completely different side of Mal, and it’s more than a little bit unsettling. He is angrier, more unstable, less predictable. He’s a Firefly with no engine, floating about in the vast emptiness of space, and I can’t help but wonder if the echo of his pain is loud enough to drown out almost everything else but his thoughts.

Still, despite his deeply fractured psyche, he remains one of the best captains out there, because he cares deeply for his crew and his ship—no matter how poorly he shows it. And he possesses the invaluable ability to carry on even under the worst of circumstances—goodness knows, he’s had the practice. Other captains might be softer and kinder, gentler and more considerate, but few could lead their crews through as many horrific situations as Mal can without risking mutiny or worse.

Now on to other points of interest.

Simon. I’ve never been certain what to think about River’s older brother. On the one hand, he often comes across as weak and defenseless. When it comes to combat, odds are he’ll lose, and half the time he seems to lack even the will necessary to fight back. Perhaps, because he is a doctor, he balks at the thought of inflicting injuries. Or perhaps he is so neat and orderly and calm, right down to the very core, that he’s forgotten what it’s like to be aggressive. Either way, he doesn’t seem like a particularly strong character. But if you assumed that, like I almost did initially, then you would be wrong. Because Simon is one of the strongest characters in the show.

While he may not be quick to strike back, and while he may not be able to hold his own in a fist fight—as a general rule—he isn’t afraid to put himself in harm’s way if it means standing up for his sister or finding out information he deems important. More often than not, he thinks of others over himself. Throughout the brief span of the show and the companion movie, we witness multiple examples of his caring, patient nature as he deals with his sister’s unsettling mental illness. He never complains, never belittles River or speaks sharply to her. I’m not sure how many people would be able to die to self so consistently in order to see to the wellbeing of others. Jayne might be able to break Simon with his bare hands, and Mal might be able to outgun him, but they will never sacrifice themselves for others the way Simon does on a daily basis.

The Operative and The Reivers. I love this plotline—the man who fights to keep the truth hidden, and the truth that says we cannot make humans perfect through our own power. I’d say more, but I don’t want to spoil anything for you. Just know that, in my opinion, Joss Whedon offers a very satisfying conclusion, both to the mystery surrounding River and to the questions concerning the Reivers’ origins, while simultaneously introducing a fascinating, terrifying new character.

The Alliance. Joss has created my favorite form of society—the honest kind. On the one hand, we have the stamp of the Alliance—gorgeous architecture; large, prosperous cities; exceptional healthcare and security. We have a homogenized cultural landscape, a beautifully balanced blend of Chinese and American customs with layers of historical reflections. But on the other hand, we also witness the losses that come with those gains. Beneath the Alliance’s enlightened front, we get to sample the brutality and the totalitarian undertones—the tension between the Independents, who only want to be free, and the Alliance, who will force its ideas of “freedom” on anyone smaller than it. Although the American and Chinese people of the future have come to terms enough to form a single cultural alliance, peace is far from complete, and the very efforts to build a perfectly utopian society are what create worse horrors than international tensions.

Intensity. While we never get to see any of our precious darlings hit rock bottom, we do come pretty close. And I have a theory that, with SERENITY, Joss means to break his audience rather than his characters. Of course I’m not bitter. But, suffice it to say, I’m not sure I’ve ever been as invested in a story’s conclusion as I was in the last, terrifying hour of film. Like I said earlier, I’m still deciding whether that warrants fan mail and praises or hate mail and threats.

The Humor. Fortunately, Joss understands how to balance emotional roller coasters and dizzying fight/crash scenes with comic relief. So if you were worried there’d be nothing to laugh at in SERENITY, rest assured, Joss does not disappoint. Despite the raised stakes and the lowered morale, our favorite characters are still our favorite characters, and while they fall quite a few times, they also have the chance to shine.

 
Time to discuss, my little coffee beans. If you’ve seen SERENITY (and/or FIREFLY) what are your thoughts? I haven’t really mentioned Shepherd Book, but I’d love to know your opinion of him. What is your take on the Alliance and the Chinese/American cultural blend?

Monday, September 7, 2015

FIREFLY: Those Fuzzy, Grey Areas

Note: There’s still time to enter my blogversary giveaway, so hop on over there for a chance to win a copy of Ray Bradbury’s FAHRENHEIT 451 (you know, if you want).

Warning: As always, I try to stay relatively spoiler free. But it doesn’t hurt to proceed with caution.


At first, when I came across FIREFLY, I was like, “Star Trek meets Wild West? O...okay. What could possibly go wrong?” I came into it wanting to enjoy it, but maybe not actually expecting to. And immediately the narrative swept me off my feet into the great void of space, or something dramatic like that. As evinced by my minor obsession with DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG and THE AVENGERS, I think it’s pretty clear Joss Whedon and I were supposed to be twins or something. Obviously.

If you’ve seen DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG, you might have noticed that Joss Whedon seems to have a penchant for portraying morally ambiguous characters. It’s hard to tell who’s the villain and who’s the hero, and that’s great because life is like that. Sometimes we’d like it to be easy—we’d prefer to label people as either all good or all bad and have it neat and contained like that. We’re orderly beings by nature, and we crave an orderly world complete with an orderly system of guidelines.

FIREFLY is definitely one of those grey areas.

So let’s talk about the characters.

Captain Malcolm Reynolds. As the captain of Serenity, Mal is in a position of authority. Not only is he responsible for his own behavior, he is also responsible for the lives of his crew, and it’s up to him to make sure he leads them well. Unfortunately, he has some personal issues he needs to work through—namely his history with the war and the Alliance. Because of this, he makes impulsive decisions, acts out of bitterness, and relies on himself and his wits far too often. While he may laugh and joke around like everyone else, deep down where it matters, he is an angry man.

Although we’re meant to root for him, since he’s the main character and all, we should also stop to consider that he is a smuggler and a thief. If it’s even slightly lucrative, he doesn’t hesitate to pick people’s pockets, fence stolen goods, and lie and kill when it’s necessary. Often it is. Of course, he has his own ideas of morality too. He won’t murder people in cold blood, and he’s not afraid to back out of a deal if it means protecting innocent lives. So, despite his interesting take on the law, he does have his own code, and he tends to stick to it. I’ll give him brownie points for that.

Jayne. I’m never sure whether I want to hug Jayne or hit him. True, he’s part of Serenity’s crew, and he’s loyal to a point. But the driving force that brought him to the ship in the first place—money—is what could buy him away again in a heartbeat, should he find the price tag high enough. While he experiences something resembling guilt at some of his missteps, it remains unclear whether his repentance is genuine or merely an act to convince Mal he won’t cave to greed again. It’s really a toss-up.

Zoe, Wash, and Kaylee. These are all genuinely nice people, and under normal circumstances, Zoe would probably be my hero. Whedon does such a great job of making them relatable, likeable, and believable, that it’s easy to forget they’re technically the bad guys. Considering their lives from the perspectives of those they’ve robbed, it might be a little more difficult to smile and laugh at their “life of crime” jokes. After all, villains come in many shapes and sizes, and sometimes they just look like your next-door neighbor or the class clown. (I mean, you have to watch out for the funny ones.)

Inara. Okay, I have some issues with Inara, and she’s the main reason why I’m slow to recommend this show to most people. As a Christian, I believe very strongly that sex belongs within the confines of marriage, and while it’s not my place to sit around and judge others who believe differently, I also don’t have to condone behavior I recognize as physically and emotionally harmful. That said, I do appreciate the moral questions that Inara’s character raises.

But perhaps I should tell you what she does for a living. In this futuristic society, registered whores like Inara are known as companions, and they are considered respectable, higher level members of society. Which begs the question of how that came to be. At what point, along the way, did someone decide this was not only okay, but something to be accepted and encouraged? And, before you answer that question, please take into account the despotic nature of the Alliance which allows and praises such conduct. Just something to think about.

Yes, I don’t deny that Inara has nice qualities. She sees the good in people, even when it isn’t there. She is compassionate, affectionate, and outgoing. She carries herself gracefully, with both confidence and poise. Yet no matter what her society might claim to the contrary, the life she leads comes with a heavy price tag, and Joss Whedon doesn’t leave that out of the picture. For one, I would argue she is ashamed of her job—otherwise why would she take offence when Mal calls her a whore instead of a companion? Perhaps she considers the two jobs as separate entities, or perhaps she prefers to hide behind a euphemism. Either way, we see how her hopes of a genuine romance with the captain can only ever be crushed, and though she sees herself as well-liked and well-respected, she misses the fact that her clients see her only as a tool or a plaything.

As for the other characters, Simon, River, and Shepherd Book, I’ll probably discuss them at a later date.

To Sum Up. I love so many things about FIREFLY, don’t get me wrong. But I think it’s important to ask myself the question, “Does being likeable make a villain any less of a bad guy?” The crew of Serenity is cute and funny, and they mesh well together. The stories are tense and interesting, and the characters feel like real people with real problems and real hopes and dreams. Still I have to wonder if shows like FIREFLY do us a disservice by portraying a life of crime as exciting and fun, a viable option for those who would rather not be bound by society’s rules. I don’t want to undermine the fact that Mal has been deeply wounded by his experiences in the war, and that—consequently—he harbors no desire to abide by the Alliance’s laws. And I get that the popular moral spectrum has shifted in the five hundred years between now and then, leaving more and more fuzzy, grey areas. I also understand that the Alliance is not the sort of government you would want hanging over your head. But while Mal and his friends are nice, nice and good are not one and the same. And I’m not convinced we should root for devils just because they look like angels.

 

So now it’s your turn. I’d love to hear some of your thoughts on the morality in FIREFLY Do you think it crosses too many lines—or too few? What do you think the show might be trying to say about Mal’s character? What about Inara? If you’ve watched Firefly and enjoyed it, do you think your appreciation of the show would change if Mal and his friends weren’t the main characters?