Showing posts with label Joss Whedon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joss Whedon. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2015

SERENITY: Scary Girl and Hollow Man

Note: There’s still time to enter my blogversary giveaway, so hop on over there for a chance to win a copy of Ray Bradbury’s FAHRENHEIT 451 (you know, if you want).

Warning: As always, I try to stay relatively spoiler free. But it doesn’t hurt to proceed with caution.


Can I just say? SERENITY. IS. INTENSE. I’m pretty sure Joss Whedon missed his calling—obviously he was meant to be Master Torturer or Head Executioner or something like that, because he is just a tiny bit brutal. I’m torn between sending him fan mail and sending him hate mail—it’s really a toss-up.

So let’s talk about this.

In my FIREFLY discussion, I introduced some of the characters, and with them, a bit of the moral ambiguity which forms the backbone of the show and its companion movie. But I’m not sure I delved into the many aspects of the story as well as I could have, so let’s go a bit further, beginning with the two characters who take center stage in SERENITY.

River. You thought you knew River before? Seriously, no—if you haven’t seen SERENITY, you haven’t met her yet. Just trust me. The most important thing you need to realize about River is that she is both extremely old—in that she has suffered extensive trauma, not to mention the fact that she makes geniuses look like idiots—and incredibly young—for example, her heavy dependence on Simon. In FIREFLY, we get a quick glimpse at the dangerous side of River, when she guns down three men and treats it like a game. Clearly this isn’t an easy case of cold-blooded killer vs. scared girl acting out of self-defense. What makes this even less simple is that she exhibits many symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. And given her unstable nature and her occasional run-ins with the crew, it’s difficult even to determine whether she’s friend or foe. While she generally feels bad when she hurts others, it remains uncertain whether she’s able to process this guilt fully.

Let’s give her a break, though, since she’s had the government poking and prodding around in her brain, turning her into a tool for its own use. Yet, after all that, she never intentionally plays the victim card, which might be why I’m especially fond of her. Considering her condition, she would be well within her rights to lie down and play dead, so to speak, to let the others do for her and pick up the slack. Instead, on several occasions, she risks her life for the lives of her friends and proves how truly strong she is, despite her brokenness.

Captain Malcom Reynolds. Mal is a hard nut to crack, in more ways than one. At first glance, he comes across as cocky and capable, almost light-hearted, a man who views life as a giant game. But he might possibly be one of the most broken characters you could ever come across, and he wears his over-confident exterior as a mask to disguise the part of him that can’t leave the battle of Serenity Valley behind, no matter how long it’s been since the end of the war.

In SERENITY, now that Inara is no longer living aboard the ship, we see a completely different side of Mal, and it’s more than a little bit unsettling. He is angrier, more unstable, less predictable. He’s a Firefly with no engine, floating about in the vast emptiness of space, and I can’t help but wonder if the echo of his pain is loud enough to drown out almost everything else but his thoughts.

Still, despite his deeply fractured psyche, he remains one of the best captains out there, because he cares deeply for his crew and his ship—no matter how poorly he shows it. And he possesses the invaluable ability to carry on even under the worst of circumstances—goodness knows, he’s had the practice. Other captains might be softer and kinder, gentler and more considerate, but few could lead their crews through as many horrific situations as Mal can without risking mutiny or worse.

Now on to other points of interest.

Simon. I’ve never been certain what to think about River’s older brother. On the one hand, he often comes across as weak and defenseless. When it comes to combat, odds are he’ll lose, and half the time he seems to lack even the will necessary to fight back. Perhaps, because he is a doctor, he balks at the thought of inflicting injuries. Or perhaps he is so neat and orderly and calm, right down to the very core, that he’s forgotten what it’s like to be aggressive. Either way, he doesn’t seem like a particularly strong character. But if you assumed that, like I almost did initially, then you would be wrong. Because Simon is one of the strongest characters in the show.

While he may not be quick to strike back, and while he may not be able to hold his own in a fist fight—as a general rule—he isn’t afraid to put himself in harm’s way if it means standing up for his sister or finding out information he deems important. More often than not, he thinks of others over himself. Throughout the brief span of the show and the companion movie, we witness multiple examples of his caring, patient nature as he deals with his sister’s unsettling mental illness. He never complains, never belittles River or speaks sharply to her. I’m not sure how many people would be able to die to self so consistently in order to see to the wellbeing of others. Jayne might be able to break Simon with his bare hands, and Mal might be able to outgun him, but they will never sacrifice themselves for others the way Simon does on a daily basis.

The Operative and The Reivers. I love this plotline—the man who fights to keep the truth hidden, and the truth that says we cannot make humans perfect through our own power. I’d say more, but I don’t want to spoil anything for you. Just know that, in my opinion, Joss Whedon offers a very satisfying conclusion, both to the mystery surrounding River and to the questions concerning the Reivers’ origins, while simultaneously introducing a fascinating, terrifying new character.

The Alliance. Joss has created my favorite form of society—the honest kind. On the one hand, we have the stamp of the Alliance—gorgeous architecture; large, prosperous cities; exceptional healthcare and security. We have a homogenized cultural landscape, a beautifully balanced blend of Chinese and American customs with layers of historical reflections. But on the other hand, we also witness the losses that come with those gains. Beneath the Alliance’s enlightened front, we get to sample the brutality and the totalitarian undertones—the tension between the Independents, who only want to be free, and the Alliance, who will force its ideas of “freedom” on anyone smaller than it. Although the American and Chinese people of the future have come to terms enough to form a single cultural alliance, peace is far from complete, and the very efforts to build a perfectly utopian society are what create worse horrors than international tensions.

Intensity. While we never get to see any of our precious darlings hit rock bottom, we do come pretty close. And I have a theory that, with SERENITY, Joss means to break his audience rather than his characters. Of course I’m not bitter. But, suffice it to say, I’m not sure I’ve ever been as invested in a story’s conclusion as I was in the last, terrifying hour of film. Like I said earlier, I’m still deciding whether that warrants fan mail and praises or hate mail and threats.

The Humor. Fortunately, Joss understands how to balance emotional roller coasters and dizzying fight/crash scenes with comic relief. So if you were worried there’d be nothing to laugh at in SERENITY, rest assured, Joss does not disappoint. Despite the raised stakes and the lowered morale, our favorite characters are still our favorite characters, and while they fall quite a few times, they also have the chance to shine.

 
Time to discuss, my little coffee beans. If you’ve seen SERENITY (and/or FIREFLY) what are your thoughts? I haven’t really mentioned Shepherd Book, but I’d love to know your opinion of him. What is your take on the Alliance and the Chinese/American cultural blend?

Monday, September 7, 2015

FIREFLY: Those Fuzzy, Grey Areas

Note: There’s still time to enter my blogversary giveaway, so hop on over there for a chance to win a copy of Ray Bradbury’s FAHRENHEIT 451 (you know, if you want).

Warning: As always, I try to stay relatively spoiler free. But it doesn’t hurt to proceed with caution.


At first, when I came across FIREFLY, I was like, “Star Trek meets Wild West? O...okay. What could possibly go wrong?” I came into it wanting to enjoy it, but maybe not actually expecting to. And immediately the narrative swept me off my feet into the great void of space, or something dramatic like that. As evinced by my minor obsession with DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG and THE AVENGERS, I think it’s pretty clear Joss Whedon and I were supposed to be twins or something. Obviously.

If you’ve seen DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG, you might have noticed that Joss Whedon seems to have a penchant for portraying morally ambiguous characters. It’s hard to tell who’s the villain and who’s the hero, and that’s great because life is like that. Sometimes we’d like it to be easy—we’d prefer to label people as either all good or all bad and have it neat and contained like that. We’re orderly beings by nature, and we crave an orderly world complete with an orderly system of guidelines.

FIREFLY is definitely one of those grey areas.

So let’s talk about the characters.

Captain Malcolm Reynolds. As the captain of Serenity, Mal is in a position of authority. Not only is he responsible for his own behavior, he is also responsible for the lives of his crew, and it’s up to him to make sure he leads them well. Unfortunately, he has some personal issues he needs to work through—namely his history with the war and the Alliance. Because of this, he makes impulsive decisions, acts out of bitterness, and relies on himself and his wits far too often. While he may laugh and joke around like everyone else, deep down where it matters, he is an angry man.

Although we’re meant to root for him, since he’s the main character and all, we should also stop to consider that he is a smuggler and a thief. If it’s even slightly lucrative, he doesn’t hesitate to pick people’s pockets, fence stolen goods, and lie and kill when it’s necessary. Often it is. Of course, he has his own ideas of morality too. He won’t murder people in cold blood, and he’s not afraid to back out of a deal if it means protecting innocent lives. So, despite his interesting take on the law, he does have his own code, and he tends to stick to it. I’ll give him brownie points for that.

Jayne. I’m never sure whether I want to hug Jayne or hit him. True, he’s part of Serenity’s crew, and he’s loyal to a point. But the driving force that brought him to the ship in the first place—money—is what could buy him away again in a heartbeat, should he find the price tag high enough. While he experiences something resembling guilt at some of his missteps, it remains unclear whether his repentance is genuine or merely an act to convince Mal he won’t cave to greed again. It’s really a toss-up.

Zoe, Wash, and Kaylee. These are all genuinely nice people, and under normal circumstances, Zoe would probably be my hero. Whedon does such a great job of making them relatable, likeable, and believable, that it’s easy to forget they’re technically the bad guys. Considering their lives from the perspectives of those they’ve robbed, it might be a little more difficult to smile and laugh at their “life of crime” jokes. After all, villains come in many shapes and sizes, and sometimes they just look like your next-door neighbor or the class clown. (I mean, you have to watch out for the funny ones.)

Inara. Okay, I have some issues with Inara, and she’s the main reason why I’m slow to recommend this show to most people. As a Christian, I believe very strongly that sex belongs within the confines of marriage, and while it’s not my place to sit around and judge others who believe differently, I also don’t have to condone behavior I recognize as physically and emotionally harmful. That said, I do appreciate the moral questions that Inara’s character raises.

But perhaps I should tell you what she does for a living. In this futuristic society, registered whores like Inara are known as companions, and they are considered respectable, higher level members of society. Which begs the question of how that came to be. At what point, along the way, did someone decide this was not only okay, but something to be accepted and encouraged? And, before you answer that question, please take into account the despotic nature of the Alliance which allows and praises such conduct. Just something to think about.

Yes, I don’t deny that Inara has nice qualities. She sees the good in people, even when it isn’t there. She is compassionate, affectionate, and outgoing. She carries herself gracefully, with both confidence and poise. Yet no matter what her society might claim to the contrary, the life she leads comes with a heavy price tag, and Joss Whedon doesn’t leave that out of the picture. For one, I would argue she is ashamed of her job—otherwise why would she take offence when Mal calls her a whore instead of a companion? Perhaps she considers the two jobs as separate entities, or perhaps she prefers to hide behind a euphemism. Either way, we see how her hopes of a genuine romance with the captain can only ever be crushed, and though she sees herself as well-liked and well-respected, she misses the fact that her clients see her only as a tool or a plaything.

As for the other characters, Simon, River, and Shepherd Book, I’ll probably discuss them at a later date.

To Sum Up. I love so many things about FIREFLY, don’t get me wrong. But I think it’s important to ask myself the question, “Does being likeable make a villain any less of a bad guy?” The crew of Serenity is cute and funny, and they mesh well together. The stories are tense and interesting, and the characters feel like real people with real problems and real hopes and dreams. Still I have to wonder if shows like FIREFLY do us a disservice by portraying a life of crime as exciting and fun, a viable option for those who would rather not be bound by society’s rules. I don’t want to undermine the fact that Mal has been deeply wounded by his experiences in the war, and that—consequently—he harbors no desire to abide by the Alliance’s laws. And I get that the popular moral spectrum has shifted in the five hundred years between now and then, leaving more and more fuzzy, grey areas. I also understand that the Alliance is not the sort of government you would want hanging over your head. But while Mal and his friends are nice, nice and good are not one and the same. And I’m not convinced we should root for devils just because they look like angels.

 

So now it’s your turn. I’d love to hear some of your thoughts on the morality in FIREFLY Do you think it crosses too many lines—or too few? What do you think the show might be trying to say about Mal’s character? What about Inara? If you’ve watched Firefly and enjoyed it, do you think your appreciation of the show would change if Mal and his friends weren’t the main characters?

Monday, August 31, 2015

DOCTOR HORRIBLE'S SING-ALONG BLOG: Which One's the Villain?

 

Note: So, as you may have noticed, I’m not reviewing a book today. That’s because I’ve decided to mix things up a little. From now on, I’ll be using Mondays to review/discuss all sorts of media—books, music, movies, TV shows (basically anything I feel like).

Warning: THIS POST WILL SPOIL EVERYTHING.

           If you haven’t seen the show, it’s only 43 minutes, and you can watch it right here because I’m nice and I’ve provided the link for you. And, just as further warning, there are three mildly inappropriate bits. If you are concerned about this, all you need to do is mute or skip from 24:22-25:08, 28:20-28:34, and 31:32-31:38. DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG is unrated, but factoring in violence, innuendo, and language, I’d give it a mild PG-13. And if you’re like me and you’re wondering if it’s legal for this to be online, trust me, in this case it really is fine. When Joss Whedon and his gang released this video, they released it directly to YouTube, so there’s nothing to worry about. Problem solved. [Translation: Joss Whedon might possibly be my hero.]

 


Okay, now that we’re done with the really long disclaimer, let’s get down to the fun stuff. But if you haven’t seen the show already, I highly recommend that you do so before you read any further. Seriously, I’m not sure this post will make sense if you haven’t watched the show. And it’s a really good show, even if the title is a little weird.

That said, the major question I had at the end of DOCTOR HORRIBLE’S SING-ALONG BLOG was, “Which one’s the villain?”

Let’s start with our main character, Doctor Horrible (aka, Billy Buddy). With his penchant for petty theft and his eagerness to become part of the Evil League of Evil, it seems pretty obvious that he would be our prime candidate. Beyond that strike against his character, he has a few other things going against him. Like your average creep, he follows Penny on her date with his nemesis, Captain Hammer.


           And when Hammer pushes Billy past his breaking point, Billy decides to murder the Captain. Seems clear-cut, huh?

 

But wait.

Doctor Horrible does not fit your average, two-dimensional, villain mold. Oh no. Despite his evil laugh and his mad genius goggles, he also has a good heart and an interesting (if not entirely spot-on) moral compass. And fortunately, since he’s the main character, we get a unique look into his perspective and the motivations that drive him.

           So let’s take a peek at some of the things that might make him “the good guy”. Before Captain Hammer rubs his relationship with Penny in Doctor Horrible’s face, the doctor really has no desire to kill anyone, even though he’s required to do so in order to get into the Evil League of Evil (run by Bad Horse, the Thoroughbred of Sin). Though Doctor Horrible harbors a secret crush on Penny, he doesn’t pressure her to like him back or force himself on her in any way—in fact, he can be very respectful (you know, when he’s not stalking her).



           While most villains operate with anarchy as their main goal, Billy views anarchy as a tool necessary to overthrow the broken system that guides humanity.


           Whatever the case, he has his finger on the pulse of human nature, and he recognizes the evil that lurks in the heart of humankind. He doesn’t embrace corruption—in his own weird way, he hopes to fight it.


(Also, it could be argued that, had the freeze ray not chosen to malfunction at a critical moment, it’s possible Doctor Horrible might have been unable to go through with the murder of Captain Hammer. But that’s all speculation, and it’s a moot point since the freeze ray DID malfunction. Moving on.)

Now for our next villain candidate: Captain Hammer. As the one who sets himself up against Doctor Horrible, it seems pretty obvious that Captain Hammer is our hero. After all, he continually thwarts the Doctor’s nefarious schemes, he rescues Penny, and he helps the homeless. Pretty great guy, huh?


Unlike other heroes, though, Captain Hammer is a major jerk. Throughout the story, it’s obvious to everyone except Penny that he doesn’t respect her—doesn’t even see her as more than an object for his own amusement. In fact, I find it very telling that he rescues Penny from the runaway van by shoving her into a pile of trash bags—because, had Penny lived, that’s exactly what he would have done to her in the end. He would have grown tired of her, dumped her like garbage, and moved on to the next good-looking girl.


Ultimately, he’s only concerned with what he can get and by how people see him.


           As long as the masses fall at his feet, worshiping him for his heroic deeds and his good looks, then he doesn’t worry about whether he’s doing good or not. He looks down on those he considers lower than himself, and continually reminds them of his perceived superiority. And, unlike Doctor Horrible, he doesn’t care about correcting the rampant problems in society (such as the homelessness epidemic), unless by doing so he can make himself look great.


           “Wait Liz,” you say, “he does do nice stuff—he does help the homeless.”

           But my question is, if you do nice stuff for bad reasons, does that really make you a hero?

Right about now, you might be thinking “Just be done, okay. He’s hot, Liz, so don’t question him.”

To which I answer, “Wait, there’s more.”

As Doctor Horrible points out in his song (“Slipping”), Captain Hammer’s disguise is slipping—more and more, what lies beneath his “nice guy” exterior is becoming evident.
 

When Captain Hammer comes across true pain, the kind he has so enjoyed inflicting on Doctor Horrible, he runs screaming from the room, knocking over a lady on the way out.


           The fact that, by doing so, he’s leaving Penny skewered with death ray shrapnel, isn’t at all important to him—and maybe you could argue that he couldn’t have known so he isn’t to blame. Fair point. But if he were a true hero, even though he’s in pain (and not visibly wounded), his first priority should be the well-being of others. Considering that the death ray explosion occurred in his attempt to kill Doctor Horrible and thus is his fault, it’s his responsibility to make sure no one is injured.


           Instead he thinks only of himself, leaving Doctor Horrible to sit with Penny during her last moments.

“Okay, Liz, you’ve made your point. Can I go home now?”

Wait, I’m still not done. Because there’s one more villainous candidate.

“WHAT? ARE YOU CRAZY? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE JOKING. TELL ME YOU’RE JOKING.”

I’m not joking.

Because our next candidate is Penny—sweet, innocent, naïve little Penny who harbors such compassion for the dark and gritty areas of society.

“Liz, you monster, I can’t believe you. Poor darling Penny has probably never hurt anyone or anything in her life. She puts herself at risk just to collect signatures for a building she hopes to convert into a homeless shelter. Even to the end, despite the way he treats her, she still refuses to recognize the evil in Captain Hammer. She doesn’t judge Doctor Horrible. And she’s just so stinking nice. Liz, you really are a heartless, soulless, cold—”
 
All this I know.

“Didn’t you listen to the songs? Didn’t you hear Penny say she believes there’s good in every heart? Didn’t you—”

There you have it, and I couldn’t have said it better myself. Yes, Penny is a sweetie, and I’m not arguing so much that she is the problem, but that she has contributed to the problem. And please don’t assume that I’m at all victim-blaming. The fault of her death lies with both Captain Hammer and Doctor Horrible, and we can discuss the blame at a later date. But as Billy so aptly points out, Penny is treating a symptom—homelessness—rather than the problem.


           And you can’t help people until you find out what’s wrong with them. Sure, if you have a headache, I could give you ibuprofen, but that really won’t take care of your festering brain tumor. If I were truly concerned about you, I’d do everything I could to make sure someone took that tumor out of you before it killed you.

I’m not blaming Penny for wanting to help the homeless—I think that’s admirable of her, and we need more people willing to do that. Honest to goodness, that’s not the issue. But I want to challenge her ideology. If there really is good in every heart, then why do homeless people exist in the first place? When Penny dies, she dies believing that Captain Hammer is her shining, selfless hero and that Billy is her sweet laundry buddy.


            And while that makes Penny a genuinely loveable person, in order to help people, you have to see them as they really are, broken and messy and imperfect. No one is going to save the world through idealism—and rose-tinted glasses have a way of blinding people to reality.
 

So there you have it, your three candidates. Now who do you think is the true villain? Or is it fair to single out only one individual? Also, on a scale of one to ten (ten being the greatest), how mean am I for even considering Penny as one of the baddies?